King Barry the Hypocrite

Actually hypocrite is an understatement but as with all things derogatory, King Barry is the unexcelled master.

Witness his performance on “The Daily Show” on the appropriately named Comedy Central network.

Firstly, Obama whined to host Trevor Noah that he didn’t understand why there was such a ruckus by Republicans about Hillary Clinton’s perfectly “ordinary” emails. Of course Obama was lying through his teeth on this. He knows that the emails in question were not “ordinary” but rather classified, some of them containing the information with the highest levels of classification.

That was just one of Clinton’s crimes. A second one, which Obama knows about since he participated in it as well, is that Clinton set up an independent email system outside of the secured State Dept. system. One which that only she and her cronies controlled not the State Dept. IT security people. That is in direct violation/purposeful subversion of so many federal government record-keeping/archives/public oversight laws that Clinton & Co. should be facing tens or hundreds of thousands of dollars in fines and decades in jail.

Remember Gen. David Petraeus? He got two years probation and $100,000 fine after he pled guilty to what is a single quill on a porcupine compared to Clinton’s activities. Amazingly when Petraeus’s name popped up as a potential Sec. of State nominee, Democrats and the MSM immediately pointed out that Petraeus was unqualified for the job because he was guilty of leaking some secrets.

It was as if fish were complaining that a cactus was too wet…

But back to Obama on “The Daily Show.” The Hypocrite in Chief had the nerve to castigate Donald Trump for Trump’s questioning whether he’d need a daily intelligence briefing. John Hinderaker takes our foolish lame duck president to task for this Mt. Everest of hypocrisy.

If one remembers, Obama is known for eschewing daily intel briefings or playing with his phone on the rare occasions he does take one. See, The One knows all so no one could ever possibly brief him… At least in his own mind.

Advertisements

Amy Schumer as Barbie?

This story about Amy Schumer being cast as Barbie in a live action Barbie movie makes one scratch their head.

This isn’t a spoof of Barbie, according to the story.

Schumer isn’t going to ever be confused with the statuesque doll with the “impossible” figure. And her image as of late has morphed from schlub loser chick (where she made her name) to a more politically aggressive “smart” progressive romantic comedy actress. Again, not exactly the resume for Barbie.

Is it possible that Schumer could play it straight?

One would assume that a Barbie movie would be aimed at little girls. Can’t see Schumer going there.

Could she be going for a lighthearted romantic comedy? Maybe but what would be the point of hauling “Barbie” into it since Barbie has never been associated with comedy.

Could this be yet another Baby Boomer fixation, something they can’t seem to let go no matter how much it needs to be pried from their nearly dead hands. They just “have to do something.” That’s the genesis of so many bad ideas that they have inflicted upon humanity over the last five decades.

Can the producers or Schumer be planning to turn their “Barbie” movie into a more political movie? A “rebooted” Barbie? Issuing a feminist slap back at the 1950s and the childhood doll of so many Baby Boomers? Having modern Barbie as a snarky female executive breaking the glass ceiling and proving superior to modern beta male Kens. Her Skipper sidekick could be played by the nouveau svelte Melissa McCarthy.

And never have to rely on her looks.

Or maybe they’ll “doll”-up Schumer and then humiliate her — “proving” that modern frumpiness is the answer to everything and always wins Ken. Or maybe wins Skipper since the LGBTQWERTY crowd needs to be acknowledged at every turn these days.

What would be the point beyond being another vanity project that will cost a surprisingly large amount of money to make, get a huge marketing effort and then lose a lot of money.

Or the idea might just disappear, like so many other Hollywood projects.

But not to let some Hollywood disasters disappear, here’s some more election night treats. Dontcha just love Chelsea Handler’s waterworks. Yeah, Chelsea, women aren’t emotional… Thanks for checking the box on that “stereotype.” Melt, snowflakes! Melt!

Why We Can’t Have Nice Things #8764904

As I endlessly remark like a retarded parrot, “Liberals will politicize everything.”

The next example is the perfectly harmless house-hunting/house remodeling hybrid TV show, “Fixer Upper.”

It seems that the cultural commissars have run the show through the Elite Cultural Approval Filter and found it lacking in acceptable content, and therefore — PURIFY!

The hosts, the telegenic Gaines couple, Chip and Joanna, apparently haven’t featured enough politically correct house hunters on the show, specifically “same sex couples.” In addition, the Gaines go to a church and seem to be believers (cue smelling salts for the cultural commissar peanut gallery). Furthermore, this church has unacceptably Christian concerns about homosexuality. So — PURIFY!

That the show is made in the Waco, Texas, area, where “same sex couples” don’t exactly grow on trees, does not seem to have occurred to the liberal Torquemadas. Or possibly it did and they didn’t give poop. Guilty until proven innocent — PURIFY!

Interestingly, an interracial couple — younger black woman and older white man (her former college soccer coach) — appeared on the show, indicating that the Gaines might not be the most bigoted of people but to our cultural inquisitors that’s merely avoiding the charges of racism and ageism (for the moment).

The Gaines themselves have shown no political leanings either way and apparently have not made a statement on the accusations. More can be found here on this depressing story.

Expect HGTV (which has been mugged several times already by the LGBTQWERTY lobby already), advertisers on the network and the show and the Gaines themselves to be forced to crawl on the broken glass of political correctness and issue some kind of mealy “apology” filled all the buzz words like “toleration,” “diversity” and “respect.”

The lesson is that no matter who you are, what you do, where you are, you will be forced into the cultural wars. There will be know refuge from the Javerts. The liberals will hunt everyone down and make them swear fealty to liberalism or be purified in the liberal fires of (secular) damnation.

Don’t say you weren’t warned.

But not to leave on a sour note. Relish this video of arrogant liberals swearing there could never be a President Trump. Especially sweet is the knowledge that the abrasively arrogant John Oliver got it so wrong — and guaranteed that a molecule of humility has yet to enter his body. It’s a known scientific fact that when a liberal is proven wrong, they redouble their arrogance.

They can be defeated!

Fascionistas

Maybe you’ve heard some of the stories whipped out by the “Fashion” industry and its media acolytes have been lamenting the departure of heretofore unrecognized fashion plate Michelle Obama and her replacement by the apparent frump Melania Trump.

Yes, that’s a real story. Here’s the prime example from the appropriately-named Fashionista, “How We Plan On Covering (or Not Covering) Melania Trump’s Fashion Choices.”

Somehow, in this upside-down world, the lumpen White Housefrau is held up as the second Jackie O while a major league hottie and an actual former professional model like Melania is derided as if she were some four-eyed wallflower wearing a potato sack.

You just can’t make this stuff up. It’s like Sports Illustrated refusing to cover Major League Baseball because it is “too white” but giddily covering the more disproportionately racial NFL and NBA.

Admittedly, the fashion world is wildly liberal (and the few conservatives keep their mouths shut) but it seems to me that they are walking out on a limb here. But then, high fashion has never had much of a relationship with the average American. It’s for sniffy rich elites who use it to mark their exclusivity.

Liberals Behind Fake News

I gotta give credit to NPR for at least doing this piece, “We Tracked Down A Fake-News Creator In The Suburbs. Here’s What We Learned,” and not spiking it when it turned out the fake news generator was a Southern California liberal and not Tea Party Neanderthal Racist Rethuglikans or a gang of greedy sociopathic teen thieves in Romania as we’ve been told by the MSM.

But is anyone really surprised that liberals are the (at least partial) creators of the problem they are so deriding and trying to use as an excuse to shut down any news they don’t control?

If you know hardcore liberals, you know the answer is no.

This is reminiscent of Hillary Clinton’s attempt, during the Clinton admin, to discredit a Washington Post reporter, Sue Schmidt, who had had the gall to ask a few hard questions. Clinton and her cronies wanted to feed Schmidt a fake story and then after it was published, bust Schmidt for publishing incorrect news. The implication would be that everything Schmidt had published was part of the Wast Right Wing Conspiracy.

Yeah, Hillary went after a reporter for a paper that for the most part covered for her and the Big Pig. That’s how much lockstep loyalty the liberals demand. Step out of line by an inch and they’ll drop a ton of bricks on you.

One thing that has been left out of all the talk about “fake news” is that Trump was usually the victim of fake news stories. How many “stories” did you see highlighted in the ad/sponsored/trending boxes on websites about “The Daughter Trump Won’t Talk About,” “Economists Thumbs Down Trump Economics Plans,” “Shocking Stories From ‘The Apprentice’” or some other story hostile to Trump. Many of those were exaggerated or simply made up out of whole cloth.

Yet the target-rich environment of the Clintons, far past and recent, somehow was missing from those boxes.

Well, in the end we learn that much of the “Fake News” story is really a distraction or part of a disinformation campaign by the MSM.

Oh, and here’s a little dessert, watch the execrable Cenk Uygur and his band of hyperarrogant libtard twits feel the pain of Hillary losing on election night. Drink it in slowly and savor. (They actually thought Hillary could win Mississippi!!!!!!!!!!!!)