Category Archives: Business

Googlekrieg

The Google firing of James Damore could be the straw that broke the camel’s back. Maybe.

Damore had done nothing wrong beyond stating his opinion (much of it based on what is scientifically/medically known general genetically-oriented differences between the sexes). He was not incompetent. He did not harass anyone (though he himself, as a white male, was being harassed by Google cultural commissars) nor threaten anyone. He merely offered a different perspective from the increasingly extreme hyperleft perspective of Google management.

Shockingly, Google has insisted and continues to insist, that it believes in “diversity”of opinion. The company’s inability to see how it is 180 degrees wrong is a premier example of the innate lack of self-awareness of the modern liberal. That it permeates a whole company and its culture is rather frightening.

A lot of people have countered that Google is a “private” company and thus can fire anyone it wants for any reason it wants. Actually, it’s a publicly-held company. I’m a part owner. If you have a 401k with any tech fund in it odds are that you too are an owner. I certainly didn’t approve this company cultural fascism.

If Google were really a privately held company – a single or small number of owners, all of whom agree that employees need to all have the same political opinion, then I’d buy the right to fire employees they don’t like.

The problem with that approach, however, is that liberals have spent the last five decades arguing vociferously against that point. They have pushed government and legal interference into every nook and cranny of the business world, even against single-owner businesses; those that are really “private.”

They’ve forced small groups to admit members who are antithetical to that group’s mission. All in the name of “justice.”

It’s also been said that California’s famous labor laws expressly forbid firing people for political beliefs. The laws were, of course, written to protect commies and similar types but they can be protect all.

In addition, Google is a federal contractor and clearly has run up against federal discrimination laws. Remember Grove City? Take a penny, you’re in for a pound.

On the legal front Google doesn’t have even a leg to stand on.

It is possible that any Google lawsuit could end up in the court of an idiot judge. We’ve recently encountered judges who disregard what the law clearly says but they dislike; judges who feel free to rewrite laws to what they want.

We’re seeing more and more of this “No conservatives need apply” from liberals in the business world. It should surprise no one that all of their arguing about justice and nondiscrimination for decades was just a convenient stalking horse. Once they began to populate the corporate nest they, like the Cuckoo Bird, push out anyone not like them. With them it has always been about accruing power.

Reebok Lectures Trump

Athletic shoe maker has decided to attack Donald Trump for… get this… his compliment to the French first lady.

So the cretins… er… superior moral judges at Reebok felt the need to chide Trump. What is it with these people that they feel compelled to mouth off on things that aren’t their business?

For Pete’s sake, it was a harmless compliment, yet these school-marmish scolds can’t control themselves.

Are they in such an echo chamber that they cannot see they are angering a large portion of their market? For no reason whatsoever? The people who don’t like Trump aren’t going to dislike him more for this. Do the geniuses at Reebok think those folks will toss aside their Nikes and run out to buy a pair of Reeboks because of this?

Anybody who doesn’t have an opinion on the topic certainly isn’t going to be swayed by this petty silliness and the large group that voted for Trump are now annoyed and certainly not thinking fondly of Reebok.

Well, Reebok, you just lost another potential customer… but look on the bright side, you’ll always have your arrogance to keep you warm at night…

I Can Feel My Ovaries Shriveling Inside of Me

Over at The Federalist Bre Payton has a piece on our continued cultural decline.

Any article that has the sentence, “Whenever I see a dude sporting a bun on top of his head, I can feel my ovaries shriveling inside of me,” is a must read.

The Ken doll was always considered a bit effeminate, even when I was a kid in the 1960s and 1970s. That so many girls considered him an ideal mate for their proxy — Barbie (instead of G.I. Joe or even Action Jackson) — was a harbinger of things to come in the decline of the culture/feminization of the country.

It also demonstrates the liberal corporate suite stranglehold that is turning so many American corporations against traditional America. What could these people be thinking? Oh, wait, I know, virtue signaling to other like-minded libtards.

I bet the girls at GMA were cooing with approval.

An Example of Libtard Arrogance

I’ve been meaning to write a blurb on the Matt Damon/Stella Artois (Interbrew) commercial/PSA about the “global water crisis.”

Yeah, despite all those glaciers melting and the seas rising, soon to overwhelm New York City, there’s a shortage of water in some places.

They usually call those places deserts and the third-world. Making sure you have a steady supply of clean water is a sure sign of a modern, competent civilization.

Anyway, the company touts its efforts to get clean, fresh water to women (not to men? Aren’t they thirsty too?). It’s kind of a well-meaning program and would certainly be commendable as a stop-gap for emergencies.

The thing that gets me is Matt’s close: “We can be the generation that ends the global water crisis.”

Wow, that’s a big goal.

I like big thinking but, somehow, I doubt handing out water bottles individually is really going to end the “global water crisis.” Certainly not in the next few years.

The lack of even distribution of water resources has been a problem for quite a long time.

Depending on the location, there are only a few easily identified conditions causing a water problem.

It’s usually a lack of precipitation, cultural dysfunction, poor government or a mixture of those.

This is yet another example of the arrogant libtard’s strange fantasy world. A world where they can will things that have failed others. They are sure they can undo King Canute’s point that there are things beyond man’s control.

It’s like the endless “causes” they are obsessed with; that seem to make up their whole life. It’s always just a matter of throwing money at a problem, wearing a ribbon, walking a few miles, lighting a candle, signing a petition, going to an event, visiting a website, being really, really, really concerned. If we just perform one of more of these rituals, the cause will magically be resolved.

We can cure X or stop Y if we just try; as if people hadn’t tried before (and the libtard, in another display of their patented arrogant ignorance, is usually sure that no one ever did try until he came along).

The arrogance and conceit of these people is monumental and they are completely oblivious to it.

I would love to get some odds from Damon on ending that water crisis.

Preexisting Conditions

The dumbing down of America continues unabated. One of the key holdups in the health care debate is “preexisting conditions.” It’s a bitter-end issue for Democrats and for way-too many Republican squishes.

They seem to think that insurers or the government should enroll and payout for people who have “preexisting conditions.”

There’s a reason that Lloyds of London, the original modern insurance company, never covered and doesn’t cover leaking ships, sinking ships or, most importantly, sunk ships. After all, why would you buy insurance ahead of time and pay for it if you really didn’t need it; if you could wait until the ship was going down or on the bottom? You could just show up at Lloyds and pay one premium and then claim the full-value of the sunk ship — i.e. receive far more than you paid in.

Obviously, losing money at a prodigious rate, the company wouldn’t last long. Nor will insurance companies nor a federal program if “preexisting” condition people are allowed to bring their costly afflictions into the pool.

The system doesn’t work, can’t work, when such actors are brought in. It only works when less is taken out than put in. It only works if most participants are healthy and remain so.

Trying to cover everyone and every cost is a prescription for failure.

Third-party payer systems the modern health care insurance system cannot succeed under such pressures. They, like socialism, will always fail.

Adding to this road to perdition is the belief of far too many people that government is god. That government can take care of everyone (or force some company to take care of people at a loss). Government, in their eyes, has infinite resources.

It doesn’t help when people like Jimmy Kimmel, who has usually been the least left-wing late night host, goes on a “We-should-spend-as-much-money-as-necessary-to-save-my-kid” rant one night. Has everyone lost the ability to think rationally? Kimmel has millions. He could afford to pay for his child’s surgery out of his own pocket. He’s free to do what Danny Thomas did and raise money for a private foundation to perform medical miracles for ill children. Instead, he decides that everyone should be paying, whether they have sick children or not.

A system built on such a mentality will absorb more and more resources until it swallows everything.

United Folds?

Wow, that didn’t take long.

It seems United has already reached a settlement with “Dr.” David “It’s All About Me” Dao.

I’m not sure who blinked. Did United offer him some kind of outrageous wad of money? Did Dao’s shyster ambulance-chasing attorney inform that some of that tiny print on the ticket he bought says that United has the right to do what it did and, unless, they get the right freelancing judge they’ll lose so grab the money and run?

Of course United had to make a big deal of their cravenness. They took out a full-page ad in the Wall Street Journal trumpeting their panty wedgie. The modern business liberal — surrender is a mark of honor.

In a printed letter signed by United CEO Oscar “Wienie Boy” Meyer… er… Munoz, he grovels — “We can never say we’re sorry enough for the shameful way one of our customers was treated…”

He used an Obamaesque phrasing, “corporate policies were placed ahead of our shared values.”

What “shared values?” Disregarding the cabin commands of the flight crew? That’s a violation of federal law, Senor Munoz.

Seat belt light on? Eh, ignore it. What are they going to do to you?

So, people can light up on the plane now? You’ve undercut the authority. Light up, everyone!!!

Heck, go into the bathroom and disable the smoke detector and fire up that blunt. What’s the worst that could happen? It takes four weeks to get your settlement from the airline?

Here’s an interesting bit from the letter (that terrorists are salivating over): “Law enforcement will not remove customers from a flight and customers will not be required to give up their seat once on board – except in matters of safety or security.”

Ha-ha-ha-ha! Good luck with making those distinctions. Terrorists aren’t going to walk on with their bomb or knife out in the open. Besides, Dao was clearly a safety risk. Anyone that deranged (or drunk or on drugs, as he might have been) is a safety risk.

They don’t let drunk passengers onboard or will remove them if discovered and have landed planes to remove them. Who knows the limits of a Dao’s mania. This man is allegedly a doctor — supposedly someone calm under pressure.

I had a colleague almost refused boarding because he took an Ambien too early and was practically a zombie as we boarded. It was going to be a redeye flight. Needless to say, he snapped out of it as the gate crew detained him and he sheepishly reboarded as they held the plane a couple of minutes.

And don’t forget, they hung the cops out to dry on this one. Next time you need someone to remove a hostile passenger, Oscar, don’t look to the muscle. They should all quit because it will be just a matter of time before they offend the wrong angry passenger and the company CEO feeds some of them to the dogs because he’s actually more sympathetic to a deranged rich high society type that makes a stink than he is with the blue collar muscle. To purloin another Obamaesque phrasing, aviation cops should know that United’s CEO doesn’t “have their back.”

And imagine a whole generation coming up of young special snowflakes who spend their whole day looking for offense and confrontation with what they see as the forces of oppression, authority and backwardness.

Most of the rest of Munoz’s ad/letter was stuff I’d have figured was their policy already but they just highlighted it make themselves look concerned. I was surprised he didn’t hit the “diversity” button.

I’m not excusing United’s idiotic policy concerning the deadhead crew. That’s a prime example of the behavior of the soulless MBAs (like Munoz) now running corporate America. That’s why you have cramped seats and why some flights are mysteriously canceled and they don’t bother to bring in another plane. And it’s why meals are no longer served on planes and you’re paying $25 for a single bag (while way too many people are wheeling around jumbo ‘carry-on’ bags causing boarding times to skyrocket).

I can say that I will not be flying the friendly skies of United in the future.