And She Gets Away With It…

As Yogi Berra supposedly said, “It’s deja vu all over again.”

The Hillary Clinton fibs about her State Dept. email continue the traditional Clinton pattern.

These diaphanous defenses that they trot out are almost always blatantly false and rely on a news media that incredibly takes them seriously. If such nonsense was uttered by a Republican, the news media would “flood the zone,” rifle through them and deploy an army of “fact checkers” to knock them down But for a transparently absurd defense like the one Mrs. Clinton deployed, they shrink back and look everywhere but at the elephant in the room (the elephant sitting on their chest!).

Take for example the number 60,000 emails that Mrs. Clinton offered up. Let’s do a quick back of the envelope calculation, something any reporter could do in a matter of seconds – if they wanted to. Divide 60,000 emails by 1,500 days (roughly the amount of time [four years] that she was Secretary of State – it’s 24/7 job). And you get the number 40. Divide that in half because Mrs. Clinton has said that only half the emails were “official State Dept. business.” So she is saying that the Secretary of State for the United States of America, the biggest and most powerful nation on the planet, gets only 20 emails a day? Seriously? That’s all? I can get that in a busy hour at my job.

How about this howler? She said that she didn’t use the State Dept. email system but rather only used her private server for emailing because she’s easily confused, but she also said that she never used it for any “classified” emails. So she’s telling us that in four years of work, the Secretary of State for the United States of America, the biggest and most powerful nation on the planet, got not a single classified email? Not one?  Not a single “Talking Points for Secret Negotiations” email? No “CIA Briefing on Iranian Involvement in Middle East Terror” emails? Nothing “For Your Eyes Only”?

It’s like catching the kid with the cookie jars locked onto both hands and one on his head yet he sits there denying he ever put his hand in a cookie jar. In fact, she insists there are no cookie jars at all. The brazenness is unfathomable.

But they get away with it again.

The simple fact is that Mrs. Clinton has committed at least one nonviolent felony – purposeful destruction of government records. And these aren’t the records of a minor bureaucrat in the Dept. of Twine Quality. The Secretary of State is effectively the top bureaucrat.

Furthermore, it wasn’t her call or the call of her minions as to what to turn over to the State Dept. She had to turn it all over. State Dept. records people would decide what needed to be kept.

In addition, it’s laughable that the “server” was “wiped” clean. Unless the IT person putting the system together was told specifically to do it the wrong way, they would have built a mirroring RAID system. That means that multiple hard drives would have been constantly backing up the system. They would have had to wipe multiple drives or the RAID system would have allowed for reconstruction of the email archive. It’s also likely that they were backing up “off-site” for additional redundancy.

In a day of cheap hard drives and storage, the concept that the emails are lost is ridiculous – unless they were purposefully trying to hide something. Why wipe them? The hard drives should have been pulled and set on a shelf in case anyone needed to look at them later; maybe years or decades later. What about all those future Clinton scholars that will want to study her? What about the future Hillary Clinton Library – won’t it need source material? (Stop laughing!) Shouldn’t the National Archives be chiming in on this?

If they deleted the files from those drives, it was because they were hiding something.

Yet she gets away with it.

Can you imagine the furor if Dick Cheney had done this or a Republican currently occupied the White House and trotted out this nonsense? CNN would be running with it 24 hours a day. The networks would be running specials with titles like “Crisis at the White House.” Several MSNBC hosts probably would have stroked out by now. Hill Democrats likely would be demanding heads, if not immediate impeachment or resignation and the MSM (newspaper division) might actually hire little kids to hawk their “Extra!” editions on the streets in a flashback to the good old days.

But it’s the Democrats so any news at all comes out grudgingly and promising avenues of investigation are mysteriously abandoned for other things (Hey, didja hear? Marco Rubio bought a $3,000 refrigerator! He’s some crazy kind of spender! – Washington Post)

Mrs. Clinton’s behavior could have been predicted. If you remember back when the Clintons were occupying the White House they were caught red-handed (without consequences as usual) on one scandal (Filegate perhaps?) when the emails they thought they had deleted were recovered off of the backup drives within the government IT system. They learned their lesson this time and had a “private” server so they could control the entire chain of evidence.

This whole episode didn’t happen by accident.

And she gets away with it.

My First Blog

I think these things need training wheels. Bear with me as I learn the ropes here on WordPress.

I will use this space to express my various thoughts on various things. Many will be political but some will just be odd observations.

Oh, and I need to promote my book (and eventually, books). Buy my book. It’s cheap!

Open Letter to Dick Wolf (and the CSI and NCIS Dudes)

Dear Dick and Fellow TV Programming Gods – The future of TV is clear (unless the government, likely the FCC steps in) – IPTV.

Your TV will increasingly be seen as a browser rather than the dumb monitor that it has been since TV started.

You may not realize it now, but if you have Verizon FiOS or any other of the fiber-optic-delivered services, you are already there. It’s just a matter of time before they start breaking it out.

Anyway, in the future, some programmers will be like websites or portals…

It will be completely Choice TV not Appointment TV as we’ve had for lo, these many decades.

I’ll have more on this glorious TV-holic paradise in the future.

But first – my brilliant idea (and no, I’m not claiming to have invented this concept): or There will come a time when it will dawn on you (if it hasn’t already) or your fabulously wealthy descendants, that you don’t need NBC (or TNT or TBS or USA, and a thousand local stations, et al); that you have a whomping big catalog of Law and Orders, and don’t need NBC or TBS to air them (and then split the proceeds). In fact, you have so much programming that you could have your own cable channel.

But why share the wealth with Comcast, Verizon, Charter, et al? The magic of IPTV allows you to start your own, personal cable network.

That’s right!

What most people don’t understand, including a lot in the industry itself (and any idiot thinking ‘Net Neutrality’ would ever work as they fantasized), is that these big cable companies are nothing more than miniature closed Internet universes. That is, they are nothing more than a jumbo website, they’ve just dumb-downed the GUI on your TV so you can’t see that.

That’s why all that video-on-demand is now proliferating. The program is just a digital file that can be accessed by anyone, anywhere, anytime. And that’s why, increasingly, the cable companies peddle that “You can restart the program….” feature. Couldn’t do that when putting a program on involved slapping a master cassette into a machine in New Jersey and everyone had to turn to Channel 7 at the same time to watch. It can now be on-demand all the time for all those on fiber-optic networks. (I’m simplifying here because there are legal hurdles concerning who owns what programs, which will hamstring this for a while – until greed breaks down the barriers).

So back to you, Big Dick Wolf.

Imagine turning on your TV and first you see something more like a browser. The old electronic program guide (‘EPG’ in industry terms) is gone. You are free as a bird to watch whatever you want. Now, likely, there’ll be some kind of portal alerting you to what’s newly available, and smart algorithms or ads pitching you other things to watch based on your viewing history but you can choose to go anywhere you like. And you’ll probably have your “Favorites” on the TV desktop.

Let’s say someone is having a Law and Order craving. They type in (with a real QWERTY keyboard — make this happen now cable box builders!) or Lawand (or it autofills or is a bookmark) and suddenly they have a screen full all sorts of Law and Order choices: original, SVU, Criminal Intent… They can choose by season. They can choose by actor. Oh, that Jill Hennessey was hot, I’ll never forgive Lenny Briscoe for getting her killed… What about guest appearances? Comedian Larry Miller was super-creepy in a pair of episodes. Or maybe, they’re feeling lucky so they hit “random shuffle.”

And to get them to hang around (because it plays ads on the site and in the commercial breaks), there are extras to be seen: dozens/hundreds of interviews with actors, directors, writers, Dick Wolf youself; commentaries on some programs; specials on the whole Law and Order oeuvre; subject matter grouped marathons; and so much more. (Since the average Law and Order viewer is upper income and bought a Cadillac or Lexus within the last five years… Marketers stampede to place their wares at the site and in the commercial breaks.)

This will happen. The only question is — how long before it does (again, assuming the FCC and various Maoist ‘consumer’ and Internet activists don’t screw it up).

All I ask, for opening your eyes to the glorious IPTV future, is, like maybe, 1% of the gross on and related properties. I’ll make a deal with you now, I’ll take 0.1% of the gross (not the ‘net,’ I’m onto that Hollywood scam).

Oh, and ditto on the and franchises. It’s a small price to pay for the millions that will flow in.

You’re welcome!

The Mystery of Yahoo! Sports Writers

Maybe it’s out of habit, I’ve been visiting Yahoo! Sports for years and played through many a fantasy baseball, basketball and football season. It’s serviceable and, frankly, just seems better than others such as Fox and CBS – though I do partake in and

But there’s one thing that bothers me: Yahoo Sports’ writers’ obsession with promoting homosexuality in sports is a little weird.

Admittedly, most of the name writers are clearly politically liberal. Kelly Dwyer is extremely liberal and Adrian Wojnarowski and Jeff Passan etc. aren’t far behind.

It’s really bad when they seem to feel compelled to stick their political opinions in where none are needed, much less required.

I have to wonder, though, doesn’t anyone at Yahoo! read these guys? Yes, the place is run by liberals, as anyone can tell from the Yahoo! News feed, but still, shouldn’t someone notice that their chief sports writers are often pilloried by commenters when they bring politics into their stories. Easily 80-90% of the commenters pound these guys when they run one of their “Joe Jones is the first openly gay wide receiver in the Northeastern conference… A great day for college football…”

Is the ability to score in the locker room (rather than on the field) that much of a positive?

My question for Yahoo! Sports is – Why do you employ writers that seem to not be liked by the readership?

(Probable answer from at least one Yahoo! major domo – Because they need to enlighten the ignorant, racist, sexist rubes that most sports fans are.)

Are there no conservative sports writers to be hired? Or are the people keeping their mouths shut/opinions to themselves conservative (at least some of them). Of course any conservative working in the liberal media also knows that for career safety you need to keep your opinions to yourself or you will be marked man.

Just give me the scores and the facts, ma’am. I don’t need to know that UMass guard Derrick Gordon is hyped up on his own gayness. “‘Now I can finally play as a gay man!’ he says proudly.” What does that even mean?

Because someone had to say it